Page 19 - Murfreesboro, TN Comprehensive Plan: Chapter 7, Economic Development
P. 19

Economic Development            7.19


                                                                                                  DRAFT 12.02.15

































                  Building Improvement Incentive

                  Programs

                  Bad redesign and “dark” or underused upper floors   cities offer financial assistance for substantial upper-
                  are common problems of many older downtowns.   floor renovations intended to reactivate long dormant
                  Both conditions detract from the attractiveness and   spaces above street level.
                  vitality of downtown districts and can pose a drag on   These grants and loans are often funded in the same way
                  visitor and investor interest alike. Some fairly common   as façade grants described above. However because
                  incentive programs can help impel property owners to   of the high cost and often upside-down economics
                  maximize the value of their buildings while restoring   of returning vacant space to active use (including
                  and revitalizing Downtown Murfreesboro in the process.   Americans with  Disabilities  Act  compliance, e.g.,
                  None should be used in-lieu of, but rather in addition to,   elevators  and  Universal  Design),  funding  needs  to  be
                  aggressive code enforcement.                   more liberal and tied to the estimated post renovation
                                                                 value of the property.
                  FAÇADE GRANTS AND LOANS
                                                                 Generally speaking, any grant that can be amortized
                  The most common form of building incentive is façade
                  grants  and  loans.  These  are  typically  small-dollar   through incremental property tax revenues over a term
                  matching funds for the exterior repair and restoration of   of five to eight years is probably a good candidate for
                  formerly historic buildings.                   this type of program. This can be discerned through a
                                                                 before and after (estimated) appraisal of the property,
                  A typical transaction would involve the City putting   and with a firm agreement from the property-owner
                  up a dollar-for-dollar match to return a highly visible,   to pay any and all new taxes needed to replenish the
                  but inappropriately modernized historic building to   program within the stated time frame. As with most
                  something closer to its original look. Funds are usually   façade grants, the applicant should be required to front
                  set aside from the city’s general fund or from an existing   at least 50 percent of the total cost of rehabilitation.
                  TIF district and design oversight is guided by historic   Also, since the intent is to help enliven Downtown at
                  preservation guidelines promulgated by a city’s historic   different times of the day and week, preference should
                  preservation commission, civic design commission or   be given to residential units over offices.
                  Main Street board. Main Street organizations and staff
                  often provide technical and architectural assistance.   City and/or Main Street staff should poll Downtown
                                                                 property-owners about their interest in taking
                  UPPER-FLOOR OCCUPANCY GRANTS                   advantage of such programs before any time and effort
                  To  help  relieve  the  deadening  effects  of  dark  upper   is spent establishing them.
                  floors in downtowns aspiring to be more lively, some
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24