Page 23 - Valparaiso, IN U.S. 30 Corridor Plan
P. 23

Adopted July 25, 2011














































                  Map 2.4, Natural Features and Constraints






                  Natural Features & Open Space

                  The corridor’s natural landscape is largely rolling and moraine-  through landfilling and deep pilings. Aside from the pathways
                  like due to its location on the edge of the Valparaiso Morraine.   and linear parks shown elsewhere in this plan, there are no
                  There are numerous patches of wetlands, woodlands and   parks or dedicated open space preserves currently planned
                  hydric soils in the corridor’s midsection formed by the Salt   within a ¼ -mile of the corridor.
                  Creek and its various tributaries. A large impound area is
                  located on the southern edge of the corridor to the east of the   Zoning
                  Norfolk Southern right-of-way. The western end of the corridor
                  is also heavily impacted with wetlands interspersed with rolling   Zoning in the corridor east of Hayes Leonard Road consists
                  countryside just east of IN 250-West. The north side of the   mostly of General Commercial. The area west of Hayes
                  corridor is generally higher in elevation than the south side with   Leonard is under County zoning control and is zoned
                  tree-top views along portions of West and South streets.   primarily residential. All new development within the corridor
                                                                        is subject to the Nonresidential Design Standards of the City’s
                  The area’s drainage system is largely hidden from view and,   Unified Development Ordinance as well as additional special
                  with only a few exceptions, has not been used as a site amenity   standards for the US-30 “signature overlay district”.
                  by  area  property  owners. There  have many  instances of
                  floodplain infill and developers who have gone to extraordinary
                  lengths to alter the structural suitability of their properties




              6
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28