Page 76 - Valparaiso, IN U.S. 30 Corridor Plan
P. 76

Adopted July 25, 2011





 the corridor. The bigger ticket items are likely to be the pedestrian bridges   The City should also seek an agreement with Valparaiso University for it to   Map 4.1, Proposed New TIF District
 on the east (campus) and central segments of the corridor, the obelisk(s)   absorb the cost of installing and/or maintaining special landscaping along the
 at Washington Street, entry signs at the east and west gateways, and the   section of highway that crosses in front of the campus.
 structural arch incorporated into the Highway 49 overpass.
 Priority Planning Area: Downtown Vestibule
 Given its exceedingly high cost, the burying of overhead wires is best done
 incrementally in conjunction  with major  redevelopment  projects  or  major   The triangle formed by Route 2, US-30 and Horseprairie Avenue is a critical
 road/sewer/water reconstruction projects when the roadway is already   redevelopment opportunity requiring direct City intervention in the areas of
 “opened up”. The undergounding of utilities should also be coordinated with   land assembly, new infrastructure, and environmental/ geo-technical repair.
 the installation of high-capacity (4-G+) fiber-optic along the entire length of   The entire area is an important tone-setter for Downtown. However it is unlikely
 the corridor.   to redevelop well on its own because of fragmented property ownership and
 serious geo-technical constraints.
 Outside of the immediate highway right-of-way, the most expensive capital
 improvements will be the various road extensions and realignments shown   As stated earlier, the area meets all of the criteria of a proposed TIF district as
 throughout the plan. These will have to be developed through a combination   far as meeting the technical definition of “blight” under most states’ statutes.
 of  official  mapping/platting,  land  dedication,  special  assessments,  and   Including it in a TIF district that also includes the north side of the intersection,
 possibly TIF. Of these, the extension of Campbell Street poses perhaps the   may allow the district to passively capture tax increments from already pending
 greatest engineering (and cost) challenges. If the costs of this project prove   developments in the area.
 to be too steep, the City should at least consider installing a bike-ped tunnel
 connecting lower Campbell street to the Chicago Dash (TOD) site.  The basic process of creating a new TIF district involves preparing a statutory
 redevelopment plan and a blight study and TIF project plan. The latter outlines
 Necessary environmental infrastructure projects include streambank   eligible project costs that may include both “soft” (i.e. design and other
 cleanup and restoration along Salt Creek and a handful of site reclamations   consultant fees) and “hard” costs.  These costs may include some or all of the
 east of Route 2/ Washington Street. This work would preferably be prioritized   following:
 through a comprehensive stormwater management plan, emphasizing
 collective detention, for the entire Salt Creek watershed in the vicinity of US-  •   environmental site assessment
 30. Remediation costs may possibly be covered in whole or in part by grants   •   engineering & design
 available through Federal and state departments of natural/environmental   •   market studies
 resources or by the Army Corps of Engineers.    •   financial feasibility studies
 •   site acquisition
 4. Privately-Led Initiatives   •   demolition and site prep
 •   geo-technical stabilization
 The phrase “privately-led” belies the fact that such initiatives often take public   •   sewer and water upgrades
 coaxing to get started. Still, the idea is to encourage private business and   •   new roads and sidewalks
 property owners to assume greater stewardship over the highway by taking   •   stream bank restoration
 partial care for it themselves (by directly paying for landscape installation   •   streetscape
 and/or maintenance for instance), or by contributing to a dedicated fund to   •   stormwater detention
 extend the improvements over a larger area.   •   developer fees

 The second of these scenarios is the business improvement district (BID)   As a first course of action, the City should talk to current property owners to
 model which is already in existence downtown. Although commonly organized   gauge their interest in partnering in a comprehensive redevelopment effort.
 to maintain publicly-funded landscape improvements, corridor-wide BIDs in   Possible owner positions may include: seller, equity partner or developer.
 other cities are increasingly involved in funding bigger ticket items such as
 stylized entry signs, art installations, transit shelters, decorative lighting and   On the regulatory side, the City should rezone the area to allow for a mix of
 traffic studies.
 medium and small-format, master-planned commercial buildings in multi-
 story structures. The area should also be a part of a special design overlay
 The City can help encourage more self-help activities by organizing meetings   district that requires a minimum of 2-story, 4-sided architecture (see examples
 among corridor businesses to facilitate the formation of a working corridor   on previous spread). Master planned, planned unit development is something
 business association. Later, the City can work with the group on ideas for cost-  that the City should actively pursue by trying to consolidate ownership in the
 sharing projects and joint promotions. A starter project could be the creation   hands of master developer.
 of a fund (capitalized by donations from area businesses) to maintain any
 city-installed landscaping along the medians.




 32
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81